Gartner AH, Mack T, Somerlott RG, Walsh LC. Differential diagnosis of internal and external root resorption. J Endod.1976 Nov;2(11):329-34
2.
Trope M. Cervical root resorption J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Apr;128 Suppl:56S-59S
3.
Trope M. Root resorption of dental and traumatic origin: classification based on etiology. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998 May;10(4):515-22.
4.
Ne RF, Witherspoon DE, Gutmann JL. Tooth resorption. Quintessence Int. 1999 Jan;30(1):9-25
5.
Heithersay, GS. Clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features of invasive cervical resorption. Quintessence Int. 1999 Jan;30(1):27-37.
6.
Heithersay, GS. Invasive cervical resorption: an analysis of potential predisposing factors. Quintessence Int. 1999 Feb;30(2):83-95.
7.
Heithersay, GS. Treatment of invasive cervical resorption: an analysis of results using topical application of trichloracetic acid, curettage, and restoration.
Quintessence Int. 1999 Feb;30(2):96-110.
8.
Levin L, Trope M. Root resorption. In Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE, eds. Seltzer and Bender’s dental pulp. 3rd ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., Carol
Stream, IL, 2001;425-47.
9.
Trope M, Blanco L, Chivian N, Sigurdsson A. The role of endodontics alter dental traumatic injuries. In Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, eds. Pathways of the Pulp.
9th ed. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, MO. 2006;637.
10.
Patel S, Kanagasingam S, Pitt Ford T. External cervical resorption: a review. Journal of Endodontics. 2009 May;35(5):616-25.
11.
Patel S, Ricucci D, Durak C, Tay F. Internal root resorption: a review. Journal of Endodontics. 2010 Jul;36(7):1107-21.
12.
Roscoe MG, Meira JB, Cattaneo PM. Association of orthodontic force system and root resorption: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015
May;147(5):610-26.
13.
Ahangari Z, Nasser M, Mahdian M, Fedorowicz Z, Marchesan MA. Interventions for the management of external root resorption. 2015 Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. Nov; 11:CD008003.
Figure 10
A. Conventional periapical radiographic image of a lower
canine tooth displaying an extra canal invasive resorptive
defect in the cervical region of the root. The full buccolin-
gual extent of the lesion cannot be determined.
B. A cone beam computed tomograph of the same tooth.
The axial view (white arrow) indicates that the resorptive
defect extends from the buccal aspect of the root through
the mesial proximal region to the lingual area. This is not
surgically accessible, and thus the tooth is recommended